Should I See A Male Or Female Therapist?

I was recently preparing a presentation for men who are training to become registered massage therapists – men being, until recently, a minority in a profession largely staffed by women. The idea was to discuss societal gender stigmas and the myths which arise from them (one, for example, being that “men are better at deep tissue massage than women” – not true).

Here are my thoughts on the matter, when it comes to choosing a psychotherapist:

First: There are always going to be personal preferences. Given the potentially long-term and intimate nature of the profession, if a client seeking a psychotherapist prefers the company of a man or a woman to seek help from, whatever that selection is based on is not mine to judge. From where I stand, for anyone seeking help, the freedom of having that choice is sacred. For some clients, being able to to make that choice is an important first step.

Second: There are some public misconceptions about male vs female abilities in a therapeutic environment which mirror the “deep tissue” myth mentioned above. Though personalities between therapists are unique, with some therapists being more empathetic or insight-driven than others, it’s important to note that competency in their chosen field is just as crucial.

Share

How Long Does Therapy Take?

When does it end?

It’s a good question, and there are a few reasons why this is raised:

• If you’ve never been in therapy before (i.e. you are starting from scratch and overwhelmed by all of the information you discover) it may be a source of comfort to look for structure; to see if there is a beginning, middle, and end to the process.

 Some modes of therapy advertise a pre-set number of sessions. After, say, nine sessions, they will isolate your issue and you will have been handed rational strategies for dealing with it. A problem with this approach is: what if that issue isn’t “it”? What if there’s more to it than the “it” someone told you you suffered from? Not least, what if you are suffering from something that doesn’t lend itself to rational strategies (grief for the loss of a loved one, for example)?

You may think that seeing a therapist creates an addiction or crutch which you will not be able to shake, thus endangering your independence.

Whether you are experienced in therapy or not, not many people look forward to the unknown. If you are concerned about “how many sessions”, then this is a conversation you should have with your therapist at the outset (along with standard questions about rates, cancellation fees, and directions to their office).

I can’t tell you from the outset how many sessions you and I will have. It would be foolish of me to do so because each individual is different and each individual has a unique spectrum of concerns they may wish to discuss. However, I do make it clear to my clients that they are in charge of stopping and starting therapy – what good would this process be if that choice were taken away from you?

If you want to see a therapist but are scared of how long it may take, why not find a therapist you think you’d like to see and book an initial session, with no commitment for a follow-up?

Concerned about a therapist’s qualifications? Perhaps you should ask whether they belong to a professional association, such as CAPT, which ensures that its members practice within clear, established ethical guidelines (among which, respectful termination of therapy would fall within).

Remember: if it’s important to you, then it deserves to be raised. If a prospective therapist can’t answer your questions to your satisfaction then it’s probably best that you consider someone else.

Share

You’re Just Going To Ask Me About My Parents, Right?

Short answer: not really.

Less-short answer…

The legacy of so-called classic (or Freudian) psychoanalysis is that, from the outside (where most people stand in relation to talk-therapy) the process seems to be nothing more than talking about our parents. Regardless of whether, like me, a therapist practices a modern (or evolving) approach or whether they prefer the classic perspective, this perception from the outside can be difficult to undo.

After all, most (but not all) of us spend the first 17-21 years of our lives under the same roof as our parents. Whether they be our birth-parents or our adoptive-parents, all of us were raised by others until we could fend for ourselves. This makes an indelible mark on us. Patterns for how we perceive others are etched by our self-with-other relationships from an early age: from parents, caretakers, siblings, friends, and strangers.

I suppose what I am getting at is that our relationship with our social environment is inevitably affected by social influences from childhood (and continuing onward). This can be a little frustrating for the individually-driven client who wants to get to the bottom of something, who, upon being asked a question relating to their childhood feels disappointment that all the attention is now going to be put on how well they got along with their parents in the past and not what’s going on with them right now.

I do believe that the present is everything: what’s bugging us today is the whole reason we seek therapy to begin with. But the present is informed by the past. No matter how much we aim on keeping things focused on the here-and-now, context is king, and context is a past-tense thing. Therapy is not about your parents, it’s about you, so once any applicable information (or feeling) is provided from your childhood it should be viewed within the framework of the here-and-now, within the framework of today and not simply a meditation on yesterday. Your past contributes in shaping the way you see and react to things, so it is always good to explore previous experiences in order to make present conflicts clearer. Parents and caretakers play a role in this, but it is just a that: a role in the larger picture of you.

Share

The Effectiveness of Psychotherapy: Supported and Endorsed

Not that I had doubts, but it’s great to have more support behind talk-therapy. The American Psychological Association has released a Resolution on the Recognition of Psychotherapy Effectiveness. An excerpt:

“Be It Resolved that, as a healing practice and professional service, psychotherapy is effective and highly cost-effective. In controlled trials and in clinical practice, psychotherapy results in benefits that markedly exceed those experienced by individuals who need mental health services but do not receive psychotherapy. Consequently, psychotherapy should be included in the health care system as an established evidence-based practice.

Be It Further Resolved that APA increase its efforts to educate the public about the effectiveness of psychotherapy; support advocacy efforts to enhance formal recognition of psychotherapy in the health care system; help ensure that policies will increase access to psychotherapy in the health care system, with particular attention on addressing the needs of underserved populations and encourage integration of research and practice; and support advocacy for funding.

Be It Further Resolved that APA encourages continued and further research on the comparative effectiveness and efficacy of psychotherapy.”

 

Share

You Are Not Weak

One of the quiet, yet pernicious, ways which serve to steer people away from seeking the assistance that psychotherapy can bring is the idea that, somehow, seeking assistance is a sign of weakness.

I think part of this comes from movies and TV (though their depictions are getting better), which have historically portrayed individuals seeking therapeutic help as hopelessly neurotic.

Let me be frank: anyone seeking the help of a therapist soon discovers that the opposite is true. Seeking increased self-awareness (an inevitable part of psychotherapy) is an act of will. It is you, saying that you can feel better, be better. It is saying that you deserve to understand yourself better than you currently do. It is to say that keeping things the way they are is not good enough.

Self-improvement is not the admission of weakness of character, but the admission of strength of mind.

Share

What About Me(n)?

With all that has been written, advocated, or spoken about lately with respect to “mental health awareness”, it occurred to me how, perhaps in spite of its intentions, the message may be missing it’s mark. And by “mark”, I mean men.

When I look at the public service announcements, take for instance Bell Canada’s “Let’s Talk” campaign (featuring Olympian Clara Hughes), or consider the large percentage of women who both practice psychotherapy or who see a therapist, I have to speculate, in the mind of the average “guy” standing on the outskirts of all this information, two assumptions might be poking about:

1. Therapy is for women.

2. If therapy is for men, it’s not speaking my language.

First, it goes without saying that therapy is for everyone. Yet, it’s one thing to throw around phrases like “therapy is for everyone”, quite another to show how therapy can benefit everyone, particularly those portions – of which men largely consist – who historically have not embraced talk therapy as passionately as you would assume from movies and TV depictions.

This leads us to the second point: language.

I do believe that the language – heck, even the imagery – we use to raise awareness of mental health perhaps does not yet speak clearly to a wide variety of people. Within the context of this blog post, I’m thinking specifically of men who may not be feel comfortable speaking openly with others about their feelings or conflicts – it is specifically this category of people, I feel, who still struggle in silence.

There is definitely a place for men in talk therapy. Therapists such as myself are here for you, male or female, straight or gay, young or old, even if at first it takes time for you to become comfortable talking about your concerns.

 

Share

Are There Different Styles of Psychotherapy?

Short answer: yes.

Long answer…

…it’s sort of like martial arts. There’s karate and kung-fu, and aikido, and tae kwon do (to name a few). And yet there are streams of karate which may incorporate, say, judo. There are streams of kung-fu which also focus on tai chi chuan.

Similarly, with psychotherapy – whether the practitioner is a psychotherapist, psychologist, or psychiatrist – there are disciplines, called modalities. Here are a few, to give you an idea:

Freudian/Jungian: Freudian psychoanalysis is a scientifically-leaning attempt to understand the human mind using the idea of drives as a motivating factor in human psychological development. The Jungian approach is a split-off from Freudian psychoanalysis, much more accepting of the spiritual (and sometimes mystical) facets of human belief and how they inform our psychological development.

The traditional Freudian and Jungian approaches are known as one-person psychology: there may be two people in the therapeutic space, but only the analyst (as opposed to the client) is in control. The client associates, the analyst interprets. The analyst is the sole expert.

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (aka CBT) is a rational approach. It tends to focus on very specific problems with the client, as opposed to allowing for deeper (less clear) problems to come to the surface. A CBT practitioner will typically structure a fixed number of sessions with a client, with the idea being that by the last session, whatever is ailing with the client will be worked out, not unlike a muscle. This may be handy for isolated problems, such as helping to quit smoking, or perhaps some forms of anger management.

Relational Psychotherapy: Relational Psychotherapy is a newer, dynamic form of therapy. Unlike Freudian/Jungian approaches, it is a two-person psychology: there is mutuality between the therapist and the client, and the structure is such that the therapist is not positioned as an all-knowing expert who controls the kite strings. This leads to greater, fuller communication between therapist and client.

The general idea behind Relational Psychotherapy is that interpersonal relationships are a foundation of how we are raised, how we develop, and how we see ourselves at the end of the day. The focus is on the present, the here-and-now with the understanding that, while relevant events of the past are welcomed into the therapeutic space, it’s how the client feels now which is what’s ultimately important. Unlike CBT, Relational Psychotherapy is not hyper-focused on fixing isolated problems, since some problems which may seem isolated may have deeper roots in our behaviour.

Share

Some Basic Differences

One of the most common questions (and one I think many are afraid to ask) is what the difference is between the various types of mental health professionals.

Psychiatrist: A psychiatrist is a medical doctor who works with standardized diagnoses, and who can prescribe drugs to treat perceived mental illnesses. They may or may not have extensive training as therapists and may or may not have had experience as a client in a therapeutic environment.

Psychologist: A psychologist is an expert or specialist in psychology, often holding a Ph.D. They do not prescribe drugs. They most likely have extensive training as therapists, but may or may not have had experience as a client in a therapeutic environment.

Psychotherapist: A psychotherapist is specifically trained to work with others in a therapeutic environment. There are various approaches (or modalities) of psychotherapy: Freudian, Jungian, Gestalt, CBT, to name a few. A good psychotherapist not only has extensive training and supervision, but also has experience as a client. A therapist with no experience of what it’s like to be on the other side of the couch as a client is missing an important tool: relatability.

Share